BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//CMSA - ECPv6.15.18//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for CMSA
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20240310T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20241103T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20250309T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20251102T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20260308T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20261101T060000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20250207T140000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20250207T154500
DTSTAMP:20260414T153549
CREATED:20250127T151529Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250127T155730Z
UID:10003673-1738936800-1738943100@cmsa.fas.harvard.edu
SUMMARY:Is every knot isotopic to the unknot?
DESCRIPTION:Freedman CMSA Seminar \n*via Zoom* \nSpeaker: Sergey Melikhov\, Steklov Math Institute \nTitle: Is every knot isotopic to the unknot? \nAbstract: The following problem was stated by D. Rolfsen in his 1974 paper; according to R. Daverman it was being discussed since the mid-60s. Is every knot in $S^3$ isotopic (=homotopic through embeddings) to a PL knot — or\, equivalently\, to the unknot? In particular\, is the Bing sling isotopic to a PL knot? We show that the Bing sling $B$ is not isotopic to any PL knot by an isotopy which extends to an isotopy of any 2-component link obtained from $B$ by adding a disjoint component $Q$ such that $lk(B\,Q)=1$. Moreover\, the assertion remains true if the additional component is allowed to self-intersect\, and even to get replaced by a new one at any time instant $t$\, as long as it remains disjoint from the original component $K_t$ and represents the same conjugacy class as the old one in $G/[G’\,G”]$\, where $G=\pi_1(S^3\setminus K_t)$. The are examples showing that the latter result cannot be improved in certain ways. I plan to present a sketch of the proof\, modulo some ingredients. The details can be found in arXiv:2406.09365 and the main ingredients in arXiv:2406.09331 and arXiv:math/0312007v3. \n  \n 
URL:https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/event/freedman_2725/
LOCATION:Virtual
CATEGORIES:Freedman Seminar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/media/CMSA-Freedman-Seminar-2.7.25.png
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR