BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//CMSA - ECPv6.15.20//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:CMSA
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for CMSA
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20240310T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20241103T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20250309T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20251102T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20260308T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20261101T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20270314T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20271107T060000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260415T170000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260415T180000
DTSTAMP:20260610T235152
CREATED:20250409T160808Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260423T155210Z
UID:10003725-1776272400-1776276000@cmsa.fas.harvard.edu
SUMMARY:Millennium Prize Problems Lecture - Peter Sarnak: Riemann Hypothesis
DESCRIPTION:  \n \nDate: April 15\, 2026 \nTime: 5:00–6:00 pm \nLocation: Harvard Science Center Hall C\, 1 Oxford St.\, Cambridge MA \nSpeaker: Peter Sarnak\, Institute for Advanced Study \nTitle: The Riemann Hypothesis \nAbstract: After reviewing the hypothesis as put forth by Riemann we discuss its generalizations and analogues. We highlight a few of their implications and workarounds\, and probing their truths. \nRead more about the Riemann Hypothesis at the Clay Math website. \nOrganizers: Martin Bridson\, Clay Mathematics Institute | Dan Freed\, Harvard University and CMSA | Mike Hopkins\, Harvard University \n  \n\n                   \n\nMillennium Prize Problems Lecture Series
URL:https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/event/clay_41526/
LOCATION:Harvard Science Center\, 1 Oxford Street\, Cambridge\, MA\, 02138
CATEGORIES:Millennium Prize Problems Lecture,Special Lectures
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/media/Sarnak_web-ad.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260311T170000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260311T180000
DTSTAMP:20260610T235152
CREATED:20250409T160708Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260316T161233Z
UID:10003724-1773248400-1773252000@cmsa.fas.harvard.edu
SUMMARY:Millennium Prize Problems Lecture - Javier Gómez-Serrano: Navier-Stokes Existence or Breakdown
DESCRIPTION:Date: March 11\, 2026 \nTime: 5:00–6:00 pm \nLocation: Harvard Science Center Hall C\, 1 Oxford St.\, Cambridge MA & via Zoom Webinar \nSpeaker: Javier Gómez-Serrano\, Brown University \nTitle: Navier-Stokes Existence or Breakdown \nAbstract: The Navier-Stokes equations have been the cornerstone of fluid dynamics for over a century\, accurately describing the motion of viscous fluids such as water and air. However\, despite their fundamental importance to mathematics and physics\, a profound question remains unanswered: do solutions to these equations always exist for all time\, or can they break down and develop singularities (points where the equations lose their validity)? In this Millennium Prize Problems Lecture\, I will explore the current mathematical landscape surrounding the Navier-Stokes and related equations. The talk will discuss the historical context\, the ongoing search for global regularity versus finite-time blowup\, and the latest analytical and computational breakthroughs pushing the boundaries of what we know about fluid behavior. \nRead more about the Navier-Stokes Equation at the Clay Math website. \n  \nOrganizers: Martin Bridson\, Clay Mathematics Institute | Dan Freed\, Harvard University and CMSA | Mike Hopkins\, Harvard University \n\n                   \n\nMillennium Prize Problems Lecture Series
URL:https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/event/clay_31126/
LOCATION:Harvard Science Center\, 1 Oxford Street\, Cambridge\, MA\, 02138
CATEGORIES:Millennium Prize Problems Lecture,Special Lectures
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/media/Gomez-Serrano_web-ad3_crop.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260204T170000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260204T180000
DTSTAMP:20260610T235152
CREATED:20250409T160357Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260210T204515Z
UID:10003723-1770224400-1770228000@cmsa.fas.harvard.edu
SUMMARY:Millennium Prize Problems Lecture - Barry Mazur: About the Birch and Swinnerton–Dyer Conjecture
DESCRIPTION:Date: February 4\, 2026 \nTime: 5:00–6:00 pm \nLocation: Harvard Science Center Hall C\, 1 Oxford St.\, Cambridge MA \nSpeaker: Barry Mazur\, Harvard University \nTitle: About the Birch and Swinnerton–Dyer Conjecture \nAbstract: \nIn the 1950s Bryan Birch and Peter Swinnerton–Dyer made computations that suggested a striking connection between a basic global invariant of an elliptic curve E over the field of rational numbers (namely\, the rank of its group of rational points) and certain asymptotics of its local arithmetic invariants (i.e.\, the number of its rational points over finite fields). \nThis initial observation has evolved into their conjecture. My lecture will be an introduction to the general ideas behind its ever-expanding development. \nRead more about the Birch and Swinnerton–Dyer Conjecture at the Clay Math website. \n  \nOrganizers: Martin Bridson\, Clay Mathematics Institute | Dan Freed\, Harvard University and CMSA | Mike Hopkins\, Harvard University \nBarry Mazur joined the Harvard University faculty in 1959 as a Junior Fellow in the Society of Fellows and advanced through the ranks to become the Gerhard Gade University Professor of Mathematics\, a position he has held since 1998. During his tenure at Harvard\, he has mentored 60 doctoral students and served as a pivotal figure in bridging topology and number theory\, notably through his classification of the possible torsion subgroups of elliptic curves over the rational numbers (Mazur’s torsion theorem)\, which identifies exactly 15 possible finite groups. This theorem\, detailed in his 1977 paper “Modular curves and the Eisenstein ideal\,” provided crucial insights into the Taniyama-Shimura conjecture and laid groundwork for Andrew Wiles’s 1994 proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem. \nHis broader research includes seminal works on étale homotopy theory (co-authored with Michael Artin in 1969)\, the arithmetic moduli of elliptic curves (with Nicholas M. Katz in 1985)\, and the Iwasawa main conjecture (proved with Andrew Wiles in 1984)\, as well as advancements in p-adic L-functions and the formulation of the Fontaine-Mazur conjecture on Galois representations. Mazur’s influence extends to public communication of mathematics; he has authored books like Imagining Numbers (2003)\, exploring historical perspectives on complex numbers. \nAmong his numerous honors\, Mazur received the Cole Prize in Number Theory from the American Mathematical Society in 1982\, the Chauvenet Prize in 1994 for expository writing\, the Leroy P. Steele Prize for Lifetime Achievement in 2000\, and election to the National Academy of Sciences in 1982. In 2011 (presented in 2013)\, he was awarded the National Medal of Science by President Barack Obama for his pioneering work in these fields.Most recently\, in 2022\, he received the Chern Medal from the International Mathematical Union\, recognizing his profound discoveries and mentorship. \n  \n\n                   \n\nMillennium Prize Problems Lecture Series \n 
URL:https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/event/clay_2426/
LOCATION:Harvard Science Center Hall D\, 1 Oxford Street\, Cambridge\, MA\, 02138\, United States
CATEGORIES:Millennium Prize Problems Lecture,Special Lectures
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/media/Mazur_AD.hallc_.web_.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20251203T170000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20251203T180000
DTSTAMP:20260610T235152
CREATED:20250409T160258Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20251205T171720Z
UID:10003659-1764781200-1764784800@cmsa.fas.harvard.edu
SUMMARY:Millennium Prize Problems Lecture - Madhu Sudan: P vs NP Problem
DESCRIPTION:Pamphlet (pdf) \nSlides (pdf) \nDate: December 3\, 2025 \nTime: 5:00–6:00 pm \nLocation: Harvard Science Center Hall D\, 1 Oxford St.\, Cambridge MA \nSpeaker: Madhu Sudan\, Harvard University \nTitle: The P vs. NP problem: An Existential Question for Mathematics \nAt the beginning of the twentieth century\, in response to questions raised by Hilbert\, illustrious mathematicians such as Godel\, Church and Turing formalized the notion of theorems and proofs. Proofs were automatically verifiable while theorems are logical propositions for which proofs exist. The formal definition of a computer\, a definition that had strong influence on the later development of the technology\, was a by-product of the effort to define the phrase “automatically verifiable”! \nWhile the resulting theory had major implications already\, one notion was however missing in the early definitions. Proofs were meant to be easily verifiable\, while determining the truth of a proposition/conjecture (arguably a core task of mathematics) was not necessarily so. But what is “easiness” and how is it to be defined? While this was already hinted at by Godel in the 50s\, the notion was finally formalized in seminal works of Cook\, Levin and Karp in the early 70s. Central notions here included the adoption of the notion that polynomial time algorithms are (the only) tractable ones\, and the realization that algorithms seeking to remove the existential quantifier in the definition of a “theorem” lead naively to exponential time algorithms. But are there no sophisticated algorithms to search for proofs? This is the profound “Is P = NP?” question. \nIn this talk we will introduce the question and explain implications of resolutions of this question to the modern computing infrastructure\, to mathematics and other sciences. We will briefly describe the state of progress on this question and recent progress on weaker forms of this question. Finally we will also aim to connect this question\, and why one may believe that P != NP (proof search can not be automated) even in the face of accumulating evidence on the ability of computers to solve more and more complex mathematical problems\, which seem to implement brute force search in less than polynomial time. \n  \nRead more about the P vs NP Problem at the Clay Math website. \n  \nOrganizers: Martin Bridson\, Clay Mathematics Institute | Dan Freed\, Harvard University and CMSA | Mike Hopkins\, Harvard University \n\n                   \n\nMillennium Prize Problems Lecture Series
URL:https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/event/clay_12325/
LOCATION:Harvard Science Center Hall D\, 1 Oxford Street\, Cambridge\, MA\, 02138\, United States
CATEGORIES:Millennium Prize Problems Lecture,Special Lectures
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/media/Sudan_web-ad_CROP-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20251112T170000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20251112T180000
DTSTAMP:20260610T235152
CREATED:20250311T134920Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20251201T154039Z
UID:10003658-1762966800-1762970400@cmsa.fas.harvard.edu
SUMMARY:Millennium Prize Problems Lecture - Pierre Deligne: What is the Hodge conjecture?
DESCRIPTION:  \n \nDate: November 12\, 2025 \nTime: 5:00–6:00 pm \nLocation: Harvard Science Center Hall D\, 1 Oxford St.\, Cambridge MA \nSpeaker: Pierre Deligne\, Institute for Advanced Study \nTitle: What is the Hodge conjecture? \nAbstract: The Hodge conjecture is about projective non-singular complex algebraic varieties. It characterizes the cohomology classes coming from algebraic cycles. I will explain these terms\, tell why the conjecture is so hard to attack\, and why we care. \n  \nSeries Pamphlet (pdf) \nRead more about the Hodge Conjecture at the Clay Math website. \nOrganizers: Martin Bridson\, Clay Mathematics Institute | Dan Freed\, Harvard University and CMSA | Mike Hopkins\, Harvard University \n\n                   \n\nMillennium Prize Problems Lecture Series
URL:https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/event/clay_111225/
LOCATION:Harvard Science Center Hall D\, 1 Oxford Street\, Cambridge\, MA\, 02138\, United States
CATEGORIES:Millennium Prize Problems Lecture,Special Lectures
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/media/Deligne_web-ad-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20251021T163000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20251021T173000
DTSTAMP:20260610T235152
CREATED:20250912T180816Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20251030T152043Z
UID:10003753-1761064200-1761067800@cmsa.fas.harvard.edu
SUMMARY:Math Science Lectures in Honor of Raoul Bott | Dennis Gaitsgory\, MPIM | Function-theoretic implications of geometric Langlands
DESCRIPTION:Two talks on Function-theoretic implications of geometric Langlands\nDates: October 20 & 21\, 2025 \nTime: 4:30–5:30 pm \nLocation: Science Center Lecture Hall A and via Webinar \nSpeaker: Dennis Gaitsgory\, Max Planck Institute for Mathematics \nAbstract: The recently established geometric Langlands equivalence implies an explicit description of the space of (unramified) automorphic functions in terms of Langlands parameters. In these lectures\, we will derive these description and explain how far we can go with it in order to deduce some expected properties of automorphic functions\, e.g.\, Ramanujan and Arthur multiplicity conjectures. This is joint work with Vincent Lafforgue and Sam Raskin. \n  \nLecture 1: Monday\, October 20\, 2025\nFunction-theoretic implications of geometric Langlands: From geometric to classical Langlands \n \n  \nLecture 2: Tuesday\, October 21\, 2025\nFunction-theoretic implications of geometric Langlands: Analytic properties of automorphic functions as seen from algebraic geometry \n \n\nHarvard Mathematics Professor Raoul Bott (1923 – 2005)\, was a Hungarian-American mathematician known for numerous foundational contributions to geometry in its broad sense. He is best known for his Bott periodicity theorem\, the Morse–Bott functions which he used in this context\, and the Borel–Bott–Weil theorem.
URL:https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/event/mathscibott_2025-2/
LOCATION:Harvard Science Center\, 1 Oxford Street\, Cambridge\, MA\, 02138
CATEGORIES:Event,Math Science Lectures in Honor of Raoul Bott,Special Lectures
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/media/Bott-Lecture_2025-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20251020T163000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20251020T173000
DTSTAMP:20260610T235152
CREATED:20250912T180641Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20251030T151928Z
UID:10003752-1760977800-1760981400@cmsa.fas.harvard.edu
SUMMARY:Math Science Lectures in Honor of Raoul Bott | Dennis Gaitsgory\, MPIM | Function-theoretic implications of geometric Langlands
DESCRIPTION:Two talks on Function-theoretic implications of geometric Langlands\nDates: October 20 & 21\, 2025 \nTime: 4:30–5:30 pm \nLocation: Science Center Lecture Hall A and via Webinar \n  \nSpeaker: Dennis Gaitsgory\, Max Planck Institute for Mathematics \nAbstract: The recently established geometric Langlands equivalence implies an explicit description of the space of (unramified) automorphic functions in terms of Langlands parameters. In these lectures\, we will derive these description and explain how far we can go with it in order to deduce some expected properties of automorphic functions\, e.g.\, Ramanujan and Arthur multiplicity conjectures. This is joint work with Vincent Lafforgue and Sam Raskin. \n  \nLecture 1: Monday\, October 20\, 2025\nFrom geometric to classical Langlands \n \n  \nLecture 2: Tuesday\, October 21\, 2025\nAnalytic properties of automorphic functions as seen from algebraic geometry \n \n  \n\nHarvard Mathematics Professor Raoul Bott (1923 – 2005)\, was a Hungarian-American mathematician known for numerous foundational contributions to geometry in its broad sense. He is best known for his Bott periodicity theorem\, the Morse–Bott functions which he used in this context\, and the Borel–Bott–Weil theorem.
URL:https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/event/mathscibott_2025/
LOCATION:Harvard Science Center\, 1 Oxford Street\, Cambridge\, MA\, 02138
CATEGORIES:Event,Math Science Lectures in Honor of Raoul Bott,Special Lectures
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/media/Bott-Lecture_2025.v2-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20251015T170000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20251015T180000
DTSTAMP:20260610T235152
CREATED:20250311T134919Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20251021T134849Z
UID:10003657-1760547600-1760551200@cmsa.fas.harvard.edu
SUMMARY:Millennium Prize Problems Lecture - Sourav Chatterjee: Yang-Mills and the foundations of quantum field theory
DESCRIPTION:Millennium Prize Problems Lecture  \nDate: October 15\, 2025 \nTime: 5:00–6:00 pm \nLocation: Harvard Science Center Hall D\, 1 Oxford St.\, Cambridge MA \nSpeaker: Sourav Chatterjee\, Stanford University \nTitle: Yang-Mills and the foundations of quantum field theory \nAbstract: Yang-Mills theories are the building blocks of the Standard Model of quantum mechanics\, which is the best available model for our universe at the quantum scale. Yet\, these theories do not have a rigorous mathematical foundation. Physical calculations are based on perturbation theory\, but there are various phenomena that are believed to be out of the reach of perturbative arguments. Building a mathematical foundation is\, therefore\, important even from the physics point of view. A program with this objective\, known as “constructive field theory”\, was initiated in the 1960s. In spite of many successes\, the program has not reached its original goal. Completing this program is the Clay Millennium Prize problem of Yang-Mills existence and mass gap. I will give a general introduction to the main questions\, and an overview of exciting recent progress that has rejuvenated the quest for a solution in the last ten years. \nRead more about the Yang-Mills Existence and Mass Gap at the Clay Math website. \nOrganizers: Martin Bridson\, Clay Mathematics Institute | Dan Freed\, Harvard University and CMSA | Mike Hopkins\, Harvard University \n\n                   \n\nMillennium Prize Problems Lecture Series
URL:https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/event/clay_101425/
LOCATION:Harvard Science Center Hall D\, 1 Oxford Street\, Cambridge\, MA\, 02138\, United States
CATEGORIES:Millennium Prize Problems Lecture,Special Lectures
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/media/Chatterjee_web_ad.2-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20250917T170000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20250917T180000
DTSTAMP:20260610T235152
CREATED:20250311T134916Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20251010T115024Z
UID:10003656-1758128400-1758132000@cmsa.fas.harvard.edu
SUMMARY:Millennium Prize Problems Lecture - Michael Freedman: The Poincaré Conjecture and Mathematical Discovery  
DESCRIPTION:Millennium Prize Problems Lecture\nDate: September 17\, 2025 \nLocation: Harvard Science Center Hall D & via Zoom Webinar \nTime: 5:00–6:00 pm \nSpeaker: Michael Freedman\, Harvard CMSA and Logical Intelligence  \nTitle: The Poincaré Conjecture and Mathematical Discovery   \nAbstract: The AI age requires us to re-examine what mathematics is about. The Seven Millenium Problems provide an ideal lens for doing so. Five of the seven are core mathematical questions\, two are meta-mathematical – asking about the scope of mathematics. The Poincare conjecture represents one of the core subjects\, manifold topology. I’ll explain what it is about\, its broader context\, and why people cared so much about finding a solution\, which ultimately arrived through the work of R. Hamilton and G. Perelman. Although stated in manifold topology\, the proof requires vast developments in the theory of parabolic partial differential equations\, some of which I will sketch. Like most powerful techniques\, the methods survive their original objectives and are now deployed widely in both three- and four-dimensional manifold topology.  \n  \nRead more about the Poincaré Conjecture at the Clay Math website. \nOrganizers: Martin Bridson\, Clay Mathematics Institute | Dan Freed\, Harvard University and CMSA | Mike Hopkins\, Harvard University \n\n                   \n\nMillennium Prize Problems Lecture Series
URL:https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/event/clay_91725/
LOCATION:Harvard Science Center Hall D\, 1 Oxford Street\, Cambridge\, MA\, 02138\, United States
CATEGORIES:Millennium Prize Problems Lecture,Special Lectures
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/media/Freedman_web_ad.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20250630T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20250711T170000
DTSTAMP:20260610T235152
CREATED:20240219T200745Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250714T144712Z
UID:10002770-1751274000-1752253200@cmsa.fas.harvard.edu
SUMMARY:Quantum Field Theory and Topological Phases via Homotopy Theory and Operator Algebras
DESCRIPTION:Workshop on Quantum Field Theory and Topological Phases via Homotopy Theory and Operator Algebras \nDates: June 30 – July 11\, 2025 \nLocation: CMSA\, 20 Garden Street\, Cambridge MA and Max Planck Institute for Mathematics\, Bonn\, Germany \nThis event is a twinned workshop at the CMSA (Harvard) and the Max Planck Institute for Mathematics (Bonn). Lectures will alternate between the two sites\, watched simultaneously on both sides\, and there will be opportunities for dialogue between the locations. The first week will contain four pedagogical lecture series; lecturers and locations are \nMichael Hopkins\, Harvard  (CMSA)Alexei Kitaev\, Caltech (CMSA)Pieter Naaijkens\, Cardiff (MPIM)Bruno Nachtergaele\, UC Davis (MPIM) \nThe second week will consist of research talks. \nParticipants are strongly encouraged to attend at the location that minimizes travel and hence the ecological impact of the conference. \nThe application deadline was March 16\, 2025. \nDirections to CMSA \nMPIM-Bonn location: https://www.mpim-bonn.mpg.de/qft25  \n  \nRegister for Zoom Webinar \n  \nQuantum Field Theory (QFT) and Quantum Statistical Mechanics are central to high energy physics and condensed matter physics; they also raise deep questions in mathematics. The application of operator algebras to these areas of physics is well-known. Recent developments indicate that to understand some aspects QFT properly a further ingredient is needed: homotopy theory and infinity-categories. One such development is the recognition that symmetry in a QFT is better described by a homotopy type rather than a group (so-called generalized symmetries). Another one is the work of Lurie and others on extended Topological Field Theory (TFT) and the Baez-Dolan cobordism hypothesis. Finally\, there is a conjecture of Kitaev that invertible phases of matter are classified by homotopy groups of an Omega-spectrum. This workshop will bring together researchers and students approaching this physics using different mathematical techniques: operator algebras\, homotopy theory\, higher category theory\, etc. The goal is to catalyze new interactions between different communities. At the workshop recent developments will be reviewed and hopefully progress can be made on two outstanding problems: the Kitaev conjecture as well as the long-standing goal of finding a proper mathematical formulation for QFT. \nOrganizers: \n\nDan Freed\, Harvard University CMSA & Math\nDennis Gaitsgory\, MPIM Bonn\nOwen Gwilliam\, UMass Amherst\nAnton Kapustin\, Caltech\nCatherine Meusburger\, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg\n\n  \nTalks are recorded and available on the CMSA Youtube Playlist. \n\nBACKGROUND READING \nParticipants are encouraged to have some basic familiarity with the definition of a C*-algebra and quantum spin system. Some knowledge of quantum channels (completely positive trace-preserving maps) and quantum circuits will be useful. Some knowledge of Clifford algebras will also be helpful. \nPossible references include: \n 1) arXiv:1311.2717 (Sections 2.1\, 2.2\, 2.4\, and 2.5 up to Theorem 2.5.3) \n 2) Lectures by Daniel Spiegel on “C*-Algebraic Foundations of Quantum Spin Systems”\, at the Summer School on C*-Algebraic Quantum Mechanics and Topological Phases of Matter\, University of Colorado Boulder\, July 29 to August 2\, 2024. (lecture notes and video recordings: https://sites.google.com/colorado.edu/caqm). \n3) https://nextcloud.tfk.ph.tum.de/etn/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/JvN_lecture_notes_S2016_abcde-1.pdf \n4) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classification_of_Clifford_algebras \n5) Karoubi\, K-theory\, section III.3 \n6.) Alexei Kitaev: A norm bound for 1D local matrices (pdf) \n  \nSchedule Times are Eastern Time  \ndownload schedule pdf \nWorkshop on Quantum Field Theory and Topological Phases via Homotopy Theory and Operator Algebras \nJune 30 – July 11\, 2025 \n  \n\n\n\n\nMonday\, June 30 \n\n\n\n\n8:00–9:00 am \n\n\nMPIM \n\n\nBruno Nachtergaele\, UC Davis \nTitle: Ground states of quantum lattice systems: Quantum Lattice Systems: observables\, dynamics\, ground states\, GNS representation\, ground state gap\, examples \n\n\n\n\n9:00–9:30 am \n\n\n  \n\n\nBreakfast break \n\n\n\n\n9:30–10:30 am \n\n\nCMSA \n\n\nMichael Hopkins\, Harvard \nTitle: Lattice models and topological quantum field theories I \nAbstract: This series will cover the relationship between gapped Hamiltonian lattice models and topological quantum field theories\, with an emphasis on a conjecture of Kitaev. \n\n\n\n\n10:30–10:45 am \n\n\n  \n\n\nbreak \n\n\n\n\n10:45–11:45 am \n\n\nMPIM \n\n\nPieter Naajkens\, Cardiff \nTitle: Introduction to superselection sector theory: Motivation and introduction of basic setting \nAbstract: (week 1 lectures) In this series of lectures\, I will give an introduction to the operator-algebraic (Doplicher-Haag-Roberts) approach to study the superselection sectors of a (2D) gapped quantum spin system. The sectors have a rich mathematical structure of a braided monoidal category. This category describes all the algebraic properties of the ‘anyons’ or ‘charges’ such quantum spin systems can have. The aim of these lectures is to build up this theory from first principles\, using simple examples of topologically ordered models to illustrate the main ideas. If time permits\, I will elaborate on how this fits into the larger programme of the classification of gapped phases of matter\, and long-range entangled states in particular. No prior knowledge of operator algebras or tensor categories is assumed. \nSLIDES (pdf) \n\n\n\n\n11:45 am –12:00 pm \n\n\n  \n\n\nbreak \n\n\n\n\n12:00–1:00 pm \n\n\nCMSA \n\n\nAlexei Kitaev\, Caltech \nTitle: Local definitions of gapped Hamiltonians and topological and invertible states I \n\n\n\n\nTuesday\, July 1 \n\n\n\n\n8:00–9:00 am \n\n\nMPIM \n\n\nBruno Nachtergaele\, UC Davis \nTitle: Ground states of quantum lattice systems: Quasilocality: almost local observables and interactions\, Lieb-Robinson bounds\, quasi-adiabatic evolution\, stability I \n\n\n\n\n9:00–9:30 am \n\n\n  \n\n\nBreakfast break \n\n\n\n\n9:30–10:30 am \n\n\nCMSA \n\n\nMichael Hopkins\, Harvard \nTitle: Lattice models and topological quantum field theories II \n\n\n\n\n10:30–10:45 am \n\n\n  \n\n\nbreak \n\n\n\n\n10:45–11:45 am \n\n\nMPIM \n\n\nPieter Naajkens\, Cardiff \nTitle: Introduction to superselection sector theory: Building the braided (fusion) category of superselection sectors I \nSLIDES (pdf) \n\n\n\n\n11:45 am –12:00 pm \n\n\n  \n\n\nbreak \n\n\n\n\n12:00–1:00 pm \n\n\nCMSA \n\n\nAlexei Kitaev\, Caltech \nTitle: Local definitions of gapped Hamiltonians and topological and invertible states II \n\n\n\n\nWednesday\, July 2 \n\n\n\n\n8:00–9:00 am \n\n\nMPIM \n\n\nBruno Nachtergaele\, UC Davis \nTitle: Ground states of quantum lattice systems: Quantum Entanglement in many-body systems: short-range entangled states\, topological entanglement\, stability II \n\n\n\n\n9:00–9:30 am \n\n\n  \n\n\nBreakfast break \n\n\n\n\n9:30–10:30 am \n\n\nCMSA \n\n\nMichael Hopkins\, Harvard \nTitle: Lattice models and topological quantum field theories III \n\n\n\n\n10:30–10:45 am \n\n\n  \n\n\nbreak \n\n\n\n\n10:45–11:45 am \n\n\nMPIM \n\n\nPieter Naajkens\, Cardiff \nTitle: Introduction to superselection sector theory: Building the braided (fusion) category of superselection sectors II \nSLIDES (pdf) \n\n\n\n\n11:45 am –12:00 pm \n\n\n  \n\n\nbreak \n\n\n\n\n12:00–1:00 pm \n\n\nCMSA \n\n\nAlexei Kitaev\, Caltech \nTitle: Local definitions of gapped Hamiltonians and topological and invertible states III \n\n\n\n\nThursday\, July 3 \n\n\n\n\n8:00–9:00 am \n\n\nMPIM \n\n\nBruno Nachtergaele\, UC Davis \nTitle: Ground states of quantum lattice systems: Quantum Phase Diagrams: order parameters\, topological invariants\, examples \n\n\n\n\n9:00–9:30 am \n\n\n  \n\n\nBreakfast break \n\n\n\n\n9:30–10:30 am \n\n\nCMSA \n\n\nMichael Hopkins\, Harvard \nTitle: Lattice models and topological quantum field theories IV \n\n\n\n\n10:30–10:45 am \n\n\n  \n\n\nbreak \n\n\n\n\n10:45–11:45 am \n\n\nMPIM \n\n\nPieter Naajkens\, Cardiff \nTitle: Introduction to superselection sector theory: Classification of phases and long-range entanglement \nSLIDES (pdf) \n\n\n\n\n11:45 am –12:00 pm \n\n\n  \n\n\nbreak \n\n\n\n\n12:00–1:00 pm \n\n\nCMSA \n\n\nAlexei Kitaev\, Caltech \nTitle: Local definitions of gapped Hamiltonians and topological and invertible states IV \n\n\n\n\nNo talks Friday July 4  \n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n\nMonday July 7 \n\n\n\n\n8:00–9:00 am \n\n\nMPIM \n\n\nJackson van Dyke\, TU Munich \nTitle: Moduli spaces of projective 3d TQFTs \nAbstract: A gapped quantum system is well-approximated at low energy by a projective topological field theory. Therefore questions concerning the classification\, symmetries\, and anomalies of gapped quantum systems can be reinterpreted via the homotopy theory of the moduli space of such theories. I will describe a moduli space of 3-dimensional TQFTs\, and the sense in which its homotopy theory informs us about the low energy behavior of gapped systems in 2+1 dimensions. This moduli space depends on the fixed target category: Explicitly\, it is built from the classifying spaces of higher groups of automorphisms of ribbon categories. The emphasis will be on target categories which have convenient algebraic features\, yet are analytically robust enough to allow for boundary/relative theories defined in terms of unitary representations on topological vector spaces. \n\n\n\n\n9:00–9:30 am \n\n\n  \n\n\nBreakfast break \n\n\n\n\n9:30–10:30 am \n\n\nCMSA \n\n\nConstantin Teleman\, UC Berkeley \nTitle: Quantizing homotopy types \nAbstract: Kontsevich (90’s) proposed a topological quantization of (sigma-models into) finite homotopy types to top dimensions (d\, d+1). Its enhancement to a `fully extended’ TQFT was described later (Freed\, Hopkins\, Lurie and the speaker) in the target category of iterated algebras. Independently\, Chas and Sullivan constructed a (partially defined) 2-dimensional TQFT (d=1) with target compact oriented manifolds. I will briefly review the features of the finite homotopy theory and its boundary conditions\, with particular interest in Dirichlet conditions; their analogue in Chas-Sullivan theory (older work by Blumberg\, Cohen and the speaker). Finally\, I propose a generalization combining these to a higher-dimensional Chas-Sullivan theory. \nSlides (link) \n\n\n\n\n10:30–10:45 am \n\n\n  \n\n\nbreak \n\n\n\n\n10:45–11:45 am \n\n\nMPIM \n\n\nMatthias Ludewig\, University of Greifswald \nTitle: Generalized Kitaev Pairings and Higher Berry curvature in coarse geometry \nAbstract: In Appendix C of his “Anyons” paper\, Kitaev introduced the notion of a “generalized Chern number” for a 2-dimensional system by diving the system in three ordered parts and measuring a signed rotational flux. This construction has since been used by several authors to measure topological non-triviality of a physical system. In recent work with Guo Chuan Thiang\, we observe that the recipe provided by Kitaev can be interpreted in coarse geometry as the pairing of a K-theory class with a coarse cohomology class. A corresponding index theorem then provides a proof that the set of values of this “Kitaev pairing” is always quantized\, as already argued by Kitaev. In our work\, we generalize Kitaev’s definition and the corresponding quantization result to arbitrary dimensions. By replacing a single Hamiltonian with a whole family of Hamiltonians (parametrized by a space X)\, we recover and extend the construction of “Higher Berry curvatures” by Kapustin and Spodyneiko. Given a coarse cohomology class\, we obtain a characteristic class on the parameter space X\, which is integral whenever integrated against a cycle in X that lies in the image of the homological Chern character (so\, in particular\, spheres in X). \n\n\n\n\n11:45 am –12:00 pm \n\n\n  \n\n\nbreak \n\n\n\n\n12:00–1:00 pm \n\n\nCMSA \n\n\nTheo Johnson-Freyd\, Perimeter Institute \nTitle: Some thoughts about the Kapustin–Kitaev cobordism conjecture \nAbstract: In 2013\, Kitaev explained that\, under some reasonable locality hypotheses\, gapped invertible phases of bosonic lattice models in different dimensions are naturally organized into an \Omega-spectrum. The following year\, Kapustin conjectured that this spectrum is dual to a Thom spectrum\, specifically (smooth) oriented bordism MSO\, and that for fermionic lattice models one sees instead the dual to spin bordism. In 2016\, Freed and Hopkins proved Kapustin’s conjecture for invertible phases of continuous unitary QFTs valued in an at-the-time conjectural universal target category. Freed and Hopkins put bordism categories into the statement of the problem\, by working from the beginning with continuous QFTs. Kapustin’s conjecture for lattice models remains open.David Reutter and I\, in ongoing work in progress\, have investigating Kapustin’s conjecture from the perspective of deeper category theory. We have built the universal target category for phases satisfying a finite semisimplicity hypothesis\, and we are working on relaxing finite semisimplicity. We can show that any spectrum of invertible finite-semisimple phases will indeed be dual to a Thom spectrum for some topological group G acting on the spectrum of spheres. For example\, if one looks just at those bosonic phases which can be topologically condensed from the vacuum\, G is almost the (oriented) piecewise linear group\, whose Thom spectrum is the bordism spectrum MSPL is the (oriented) *piecewise* smooth manifolds; the difference between MSPL and MSO is only visible in dimensions 7 and above. I say almost because in fact our G is what you would get if you tried to build MSPL\, but could only make finitary measurements\, which surely is explained by our restriction to condensable semisimple TQFTs. We conjecture that MSPL\, rather than MSO\, classifies invertible gapped phases of bosonic lattice models.The general relation between MSPL and topological phases is explained by a certain “surgery exact sequence” for topological phases that mirrors the surgery sequence for MSPL. By studying this sequence\, we can also answer the question of which invertible phases admit a gapped boundary condition. In particular that only (the trivial phase and) the Arf–Kervaire invariants admit finite-semisimple gapped boundary conditions. \nSLIDES (pdf) \n\n\n\n\nTuesday\, July 8 \n\n\n\n\n8:00–9:00 am \n\n\nMPIM \n\n\nDavid Reutter\, University of Hamburg \nTitle: On the categorical spectrum of topological quantum field theories \nAbstract: As originally suggested by Kitaev\, invertible topological quantum field theories of varying dimensions should assemble into a spectrum/generalized homology theory. A candidate for such a spectrum of invertible TQFTs was proposed by Freed and Hopkins\, with the defining property that (isomorphism classes of) n-dimensional invertible TQFTs are completely determined by their partition functions on closed n-manifolds. More generally\, not-necessarily-invertible TQFTs should assemble into a ‘categorical spectrum’\, an analogue of a spectrum with non-invertible cells at each level. In this talk\, I will explain that there exists a unique such categorical spectrum satisfying a list of reasonable assumptions on the collection of (compact/very finite & discrete) TQFTs; one of these assumptions being that its invertibles agree with Freed and Hopkins’ suggestion. I will explain these assumptions\, sketch how this categorical spectrum looks like in low-dimensions\, outline its construction\, and how it may be used to learn about gapped boundaries of anomaly theories in high dimensions. This is based on work in progress with Theo Johnson-Freyd. \n\n\n\n\n9:00–9:30 am \n\n\n  \n\n\nBreakfast break \n\n\n\n\n9:30–10:30 am \n\n\nCMSA \n\n\nAgnes Beaudry\, UC Boulder \nTitle: An algebraic theory of planon-only fracton orders \nAbstract: In this talk\, I will describe an algebraic theory for planon-only abelian fracton orders. These are three-dimensional gapped phases with the property that fractional excitations are abelian particles restricted to move in parallel planes. The fusion and statistics data can be identified with a finitely generated module over a Laurent polynomial ring together with a U(1)-valued quadratic form. These systems thus lend themselves to an elegant algebraic theory which we expect will lead to easily computable phase invariants and a classification. As a starting point\, we establish a necessary condition for physical realizability\, the excitation-detector principle\, which I will explain. We conjecture that this criterion is also sufficient for realizability. I will also discuss preliminary classification results.This talk is based on joint with Michael Hermele\, Wilbur Shirley and Evan Wickenden. \n\n\n\n\n10:30–10:45 am \n\n\n  \n\n\nbreak \n\n\n\n\n10:45–11:45 am \n\n\nMPIM \n\n\nJoão Faria Martins\, University of Leeds \nTitle: A categorification of Quinn’s finite total homotopy TQFT with application to TQFTs and once-extended TQFTs derived from discrete higher gauge theory \nAbstract: Quinn’s Finite Total Homotopy TQFT is a topological quantum field theory defined for any dimension n of space\, depending on the choice of a homotopy finite space B. For instance\, B can be the classifying space of a finite group or a finite 2-group.In this talk\, I will report on recent joint work with Tim Porter on once-extended versions of Quinn’s Finite Total Homotopy TQFT\, taking values in the symmetric monoidal bicategory of groupoids\, linear profunctors\, and natural transformations between linear profunctors. The construction works in all dimensions\, yielding (0\,1\,2)-\, (1\,2\,3)-\, and (2\,3\,4)-extended TQFTs\, given a homotopy finite space B. I will  show how to compute these once-extended TQFTs when B is the classifying space of a homotopy 2-type\, represented by a crossed module of groups.Reference: Faria Martins J\, Porter T: “A categorification of Quinn’s finite total homotopy TQFT with application to TQFTs and once-extended TQFTs derived from strict omega-groupoids.” arXiv:2301.02491 [math.CT] \n\n\n\n\n11:45 am –12:00 pm \n\n\n  \n\n\nbreak \n\n\n\n\n12:00–1:00 pm \n\n\nCMSA \n\n\nEmil Prodan\, Yeshiva University \nTitle: Mapping the landscape of frustration-free models \nAbstract: Frustration-free models are of great interest because they are amenable to specialized techniques and their understanding is more complete among the general quantum spin models. In this talk\, I will establish an almost bijective relation between frustration-free families of projections and a subclass of hereditary subalgebras defined by an intrinsic property. This relation sets further synergies between frustration-free models and open projections in double duals\, and subsets of pure states spaces. These connections enable a better understanding of the class of frustration-free models. For example\, the open projections in the double dual derived from frustration-free models is dense in the norm-topology in the space of generic open projections\, thus assuring us that\, for many purposes\, we can choose to work with frustration-free models without losing generality. Furthermore\, the Cuntz semigroup\, originally designed to classify the positive elements of C*-algebra\, has been proven to also classify the open projections. Given the mentioned connections\, we now have a new device to investigate the ground states of quantum spin models. \nSLIDES (pdf) \n\n\n\n\nWednesday\, July 9 \n\n\n\n\n8:00–9:00 am \n\n\nMPIM \n\n\nAlexander Schenkel\, University of Nottingham \nTitle: C*-categorical prefactorization algebras for superselection sectors and topological order \nAbstract: I will present a geometric framework to encode the algebraic structures on the category of superselection sectors of an algebraic quantum field theory on the n-dimensional lattice Z^n. I will show that\, under certain assumptions which are implied by Haag duality\, the monoidal C*-categories of localized superselection sectors carry the structure of a locally constant prefactorization algebra over the category of cone-shaped subsets of Z^n. Employing techniques from higher algebra\, one extracts from this datum an underlying locally constant prefactorization algebra defined on open disks in the cylinder R^1 x S^{n-1}. While the sphere S^{n-1} arises geometrically as the angular coordinates of cones\, the origin of the line R^1 is analytic and rooted in Haag duality. The usual braided (for n=2) or symmetric (for n>2) monoidal C*-categories of superselection sectors are recovered by removing a point of the sphere and using the equivalence between E_n-algebras and locally constant prefactorization algebras defined on open disks in R^n. The non-trivial homotopy groups of spheres induce additional algebraic structures on these E_n-monoidal C*-categories\, which in the simplest case of Z^2 is given by a braided monoidal self-equivalence arising geometrically as a kind of ‘holonomy’ around the circle S^1.This talk is based on joint work with Marco Benini\, Victor Carmona and Pieter Naaijkens. \n\n\n\n\n9:00–9:30 am \n\n\n  \n\n\nBreakfast break \n\n\n\n\n9:30–10:30 am \n\n\nCMSA \n\n\nLukasz Fidkowski\, University of Washington \nTitle: Non-invertible bosonic chiral symmetry on the lattice \nAbstract: We construct a Hamiltonian lattice realization of the non-invertible chiral symmetry that mimics an axial rotation at a rational angle in a U(1) gauge theory with bosonic charged matter.  We provide a heuristic argument that this setup allows a symmetric Hamiltonian which flows\, at low energies\, to a known field theory with this symmetry. \n\n\n\n\n10:30–10:45 am \n\n\n  \n\n\nbreak \n\n\n\n\n10:45–11:45 am \n\n\nMPIM \n\n\nNils Carqueville\, University of Vienna \nTitle: Gauging categorical symmetries \nAbstract: Orbifold data are categorical symmetries that can be gauged in oriented defect topological quantum field theories. We review the general construction and apply it to 2-group symmetries of 3-dimensional TQFTs; upon further specialisation this leads to equivariantisation of G-crossed braided fusion categories. We also describe a proposal\, via higher dagger categories\, to gauging categorical symmetries in the context of other tangential structures. This is based on separate projects with Benjamin Haake and Tim Lüders. \n\n\n\n\n11:45 am –12:00 pm \n\n\n  \n\n\nbreak \n\n\n\n\n12:00–1:00 pm \n\n\nCMSA \n\n\nNikita Sopenko\, IAS \nTitle: Reflection positivity and invertible phases of 2d quantum many-body systems \nAbstract: Reflection positivity is a property that is usually taken as an assumption in the classification of topological phases of matter via continuous quantum field theories. For general quantum many-body systems\, this property does not hold. This raises the question of whether it somehow emerges in the effective theory from the microscopic description\, thereby justifying the field-theoretic approach.In this talk\, I will discuss reflection positivity in the context of invertible phases of two-dimensional lattice systems. I will explain why every such phase admits a reflection-positive representative\, and why inverse phases are represented by complex conjugate states. I will also introduce an index that distinguishes these phases and is conjecturally related to the chiral central charge. \n\n\n\n\nThursday\, July 10 \n\n\n\n\n8:00–9:00 am \n\n\nMPIM \n\n\nIlka Brunner\, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich \nTitle: Defects as functors between phases of Abelian gauged linear sigma models \nAbstract: Defects act naturally on boundary conditions\, providing functors between D-brane categories. In the context of gauged linear sigma models\, one can use defects to transport branes from one phase to another. In this talk\, I will show how to construct such defects explicitly. \n\n\n\n\n9:00–9:30 am \n\n\n  \n\n\nBreakfast break \n\n\n\n\n9:30–10:30 am \n\n\nCMSA \n\n\nDavid Penneys\, Ohio State \nTitle: Holography for bulk-boundary local topological order \nAbstract: In previous joint work [arXiv:2307.12552] with C. Jones\, Naaijkins and Wallick\, we introduced local topological order (LTO) axioms for quantum spin systems which allowed us to define a physical boundary manifested by a net of boundary algebras in one dimension lower. This gives a formal setting for topological holography\, where the braided tensor category of DHR bimodules of the physical boundary algebra captures the bulk topological order.In joint work with C. Jones and Naaijkens\, we extend the LTO axioms to quantum spin systems equipped with a topological boundary\, again producing a physical boundary algebra for the bulk-boundary system\, whose category of (topological) boundary DHR bimodules recovers the topological boundary order. We perform this analysis in explicit detail for Levin-Wen and Walker-Wang bulk-boundary systems.Along the way\, we introduce a 2D braided categorical net of algebras built from a unitary braided fusion category (UBFC)\, which arise as boundary algebras of Walker-Wang models. We consider the canonical state on this braided categorical net corresponding to the standard topological boundary for the Walker-Wang model. Interestingly\, in this state\, the cone von Neumann algebras are type I with finite dimensional centers\, in contrast with the type II and III cone von Neumann algebras from the Levin-Wen models studied in [arXiv:2307.12552]. Their superselection sectors recover the underlying unitary category of our UBFC\, and we conjecture the superselection category also captures the fusion and braiding. \n\n\n\n\n10:30–10:45 am \n\n\n  \n\n\nbreak \n\n\n\n\n10:45–11:45 am \n\n\nMPIM \n\n\nChristoph Schweigert\, University of Hamburg \nTitle: Tensor network states: a topological field theory perspective. \nAbstract: Projected entangled pair states (PEPS) and matrix product operators (MPO) are standard tools in quantum information theory and quantum many-body physics. We explain how to understand them in terms of Turaev-Viro models on manifolds with boundary. We then sketch how a recently developed categorical Morita theory for spherical module categories can be used to find generalizations of the standard PEPS tensors. \n\n\n\n\n11:45 am –12:00 pm \n\n\n  \n\n\nbreak \n\n\n\n\n12:00–1:00 pm \n\n\nCMSA \n\n\nGreg Moore\, Rutgers \nTitle: p-form puzzles \nAbstract: It is commonly stated that level k BF theory for a p-form (and a form of complementary dimension) is equivalent to a homotopy sigma model with target space K(A\,p) where A is a cyclic group of order k.  Some aspects of this standard statement are puzzling me. I’ll explain what they are. (Perhaps someone in the audience can resolve my puzzles.) Then I’ll revisit the (again standard) electromagnetic duality of p-form electrodynamics. The conclusion will be that a slightly modified version of Ray-Singer torsion is the partition function of an invertible topological field theory. \n\n\n\n\nFriday\, July 11Note: On Friday\, there will be separate schedules for Bonn and CMSA. \nTo view the Bonn schedule\, please visit the program page at: https://www.mpim-bonn.mpg.de/qft25 \n\n\n\n\n8:00–9:00 am \n\n\nCMSA \n\n\nMarkus Pflaum\, UC Boulder \nTitle: A tour d’horizon through homotopical aspects of C*-algebraic quantum spin systems \nAbstract: In the talk I report on joint work with Beaudry\, Hermele\, Moreno\, Qi and Spiegel\, where a homotopy theoretic framework for studying state spaces of quantum lattice spin systems has been introduced using the language of C*-algebraic quantum mechanics. First some old and new results about the state space of the quasi-local algebra of a quantum lattice spin system when endowed with either the natural metric topology or the weak* topology will be presented. Switching to the algebraic topological side\, the homotopy groups of the unitary group of a UHF algebra will then be determined and it will be indicated that the pure state space of any UHF algebra in the weak* topology is weakly contractible. In addition\, I will show at the example of non-commutative tori that also in the case of a not commutative C*-algebra\, the homotopy type of the state space endowed with the weak* topology can be non-trivial and is neither deformation nor Morita invariant. Finally\, I indicate how such tools together with methods from higher homotopy theory such as E_infinity spaces may lead to a framework for constructing Kitaev’s loop-spectrum of bosonic invertible gapped phases of matter. \n\n\n\n\n9:00–9:30 am \n\n\n  \n\n\nBreakfast break \n\n\n\n\n9:30–11:00 am \n\n\nCMSA \n\n\nSpeed Talks \nBen Gripaios\, University of CambridgeTitle: Locality and smoothness of QFTs \nCarolyn Zhang\, Harvard UniversityTitle: SymTFT approach for (non-)invertible symmetries of mixed states \nRoman Geiko\, UCLATitle: Omega-spectrum of stabilizer invertible phases \n\n\n\n\n11:00–11:15 am \n\n\n  \n\n\nbreak \n\n\n\n\n11:15–12:45 pm \n\n\nCMSA \n\n\nSpeed Talks continued \nEric Roon\, Michigan State UniversityTitle: Finitely Correlated States Driven by Topological Dynamics \nDmitri Pavlov\, Texas Tech UniversityTitle: The classification of two-dimensional extended conformal field theories \nBowen Shi\, University of Illinois Urbana-ChampaignTitle: Mathematical Puzzles from the Entanglement Bootstrap: On Immersions and regular homotopySLIDES (pdf) \n\n\n\n\n  \n 
URL:https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/event/mpqft25/
LOCATION:Hybrid
CATEGORIES:Event,Workshop
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/media/QFT_2025.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20250514T120000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20250514T130000
DTSTAMP:20260610T235152
CREATED:20250501T182905Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250502T173004Z
UID:10003746-1747224000-1747227600@cmsa.fas.harvard.edu
SUMMARY:Report on the Perimeter Institute Theory+AI Workshop
DESCRIPTION:Conference Reports  \nSpeaker: Hugo Cui\, Harvard CMSA \nTitle: Report on the Perimeter Institute Theory+AI Workshop \nAbstract: I will give a survey and brief summary of some of the talks given at the Theory+AI Workshop: Theoretical Physics for AI event organized by Perimeter Institute in April\, on approaches to machine learning theory inspired from physics. \nLink : https://events.perimeterinstitute.ca/event/993/
URL:https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/event/confrep_51425/
LOCATION:CMSA 20 Garden Street Cambridge\, Massachusetts 02138 United States
CATEGORIES:Conference Reports
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/media/CMSA-Conference-Reports-5.14.2025.png
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR